CONTRIBUTION OF EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS TO JOURNAL’S SCHOLARLY OUTPUT

Editorial board members (EBMs) of academic journals have been frequently studied for better understanding the principles of their functioning, impact on editorial policy, publication ethics, and entire scientific progress. One of the promising trends is to quantitatively evaluate the contribution of EBMs to the scholarly output of parent journals. This paper represents the results of the study on publication activity of editorial board members of the Russian Library and Information Science journals. To detect a share of papers by EBMs in the journal’s scholarly output, we studied a share of EBMs papers in parent journals and other sources. Generally, we detected the active participation of EBMs in increasing scholarly output of parent journals. We also studied the publication activity of foreign members of EBMs in Russian journals that turned out to bedramatically low. Formal involvement of foreign researchers to enhance the level of journal’s internationalization may explain this situation. It is shown, that the fact of publication fails to significantly impact on journal’s ranking positions. The scientific quality of EBMs papers has proved to be of higher value: in case of high quality of EBMs papers, the number of readers and citations start to increase. On the other hand, uncited papers by EBMs have the lowest or even negative effect on the journal’s rank. The findings can be of interest to editors-in-chief and founders of academic journals.

editorial board, journal rank, bibliomet-rics, publication ethics, impact- factor

1. Harzing A. W., Metz I. Practicing what we preach: The geographic diversity of editorial boards // Management International Review. 2013. Vol. 53, no. 2. P. 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0124-x.

2. Metz I., Harzing A.-W., Zyphur M. J. Of journal editors and editorial boards: Who are the trailblazers in increasing editorial board gender equality? // British Journal of Management. 2016. Vol. 27, no. 4. P. 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12133.

3. Besancenot D., Huynh K. V., Faria J. R. Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality // Theory and Decision. 2012. Vol. 73, no. 4. P. 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7.

4. Xie Y., Wu Q., Li X. Editorial team scholarly index (ETSI): an alternative indicator for evaluating academic journal reputation // Scientometrics. 2019. Vol. 120, no. 3. P. 1333–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03177-x.

5. Braun T., Dióspatonyi I., Zsindely S., Zádor E. Gatekeeper index versus impact factor of science journals // Scientometrics. 2007. Vol. 71, no. 3. P. 541–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1844-3.

6. González L., Campanario J. M. Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the social sciences citation index: Citations from documents labeled “editorial material” // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007. Vol. 58, no. 2. P. 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20424.

7. Campanario J. M., González L., Rodríguez C. Structure of the impact factor of academic journals in the field of Education and Educational Psychology: Citations from editorial board members // Scientometrics. 2006. Vol. 69, no. 1. P. 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0137-6.

8. Campanario J. M. The competition for journal space among referees, editors, and other authors and its influence on journals’ impact factors // Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1996. Vol. 47, no. 3. P. 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199603)47:3<184::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-U.

9. Mazov N. A., Gureyev V. N. Nontraditional approaches to assessing journal importance: case study of Russian journals on Earth sciences // Serials Review. 2020. Vol. 46, no. 1. P. 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1730145.

10. Mazov N. A., Gureev V. N., Metelkin D. V. Bibliometric indicators of scientific journals and editorial board members (based on the example of Russian journals on Earth sciences) // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2018. Vol. 45, no. 4. P. 271–281. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0147688218040123.

11. Mazov N. A., Gureev V. N. The editorial boards of scientific journals as a subject of scientometric research: a literature review // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2016. Vol. 43, no. 3. P. 144–153. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688216030035.

12. Мазов Н. А., Гуреев В. Н. Состояние российского библиотековедения и информатики через исследование отраслевых журналов // Библиосфера. 2019. № 3. C. 56–70 ; Mazov N. A., Gureyev V. N. The state of Russian library and information sciences from the perspective of academic journals. Bibliosphere, 2019, 3: 56–70. https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2019-3-56-70. (In Russ.).

13. Lowe D. J., Van Fleet D. D. Scholarly achievement and accounting journal editorial board membership // Journal of Accounting Education. 2009. Vol. 27, no. 4. P. 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.07.004.

14. Bedeian A. G., Van Fleet D. D., Hyman H. H. Scientific achievement and editorial board membership // Organizational Research Methods. 2009. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309312.

15. Jokić M., Sirotić G. Do the international editorial board members of Croatian social sciences and humanities journals contribute to their visibility? // Medijska Istrazivanja. 2015. Vol. 21, no. 2. P. 5–32.