Scientific monograph – a difficult way to the reader
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2020-3-81-89
Abstract
The article objective is to identify factors transforming the processes of publication, dissemination and preservation of scientific monographs, their importance in the system of scientific communications. A review of publications is devoted to the problem of publishing, disseminating and preserving a scientific monograph as a significant part of scientific literature. The authors highlighted the reasons of slowdown in the publication of scientific monographs and the impact of various factors on the process of preparing and disseminating scientific literature of economic, communicative, bibliometric, reading and publishing nature. The paper compares possibilities and limitations of the processes of searching, preserving and organizing the acquisition of library collections by electronic and paper versions of a scientific monograph presented in publications. Editing scientific monographs and their significance in the system of scientific communications in our country is undergoing a period of serious transformation: information on new titles is dispersed in many sources; lowering the development of scientific publications in general, both in circulation and in the number of titles is observed. At the same time, publishing technologies themselves do not stand still, new ways of publishing and disseminating scientific monographs appear, which affect the change in the technology of acquiring library collections.
About the Author
M. Ch. Kuular
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPSTL SB RAS)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kuular Marta Chechen-oolovna – Chief librarian of the Department of Information Resources Acquisition
Novosibirsk
References
1. GOST 7.60-2003 SIBID. Izdaniya. Osnovnye vidy. Terminy i opredeleniya (s popravkoi) [State Standard 7.60-2003 SIBID. Editions. Basic types. Terms and definitions (as amended)]. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200034382 (accessed 22.06.2020). (In Russ.).
2. Kalinina G. P., Smirnova V. P., Sukhorukov K. M. A standard to determine publication status. Bibliografiya i knigovedenie, 2020, 1: 29–65. (In Russ.).
3. Barkovskaya N. V., Bagdasarian O. Yu. Nauchnaya stat'ya: struktura i oformlenie: metod. posobie [Scientific article: structure and design: a manual]. Ekaterinburg, 2018. 45 p. (In Russ.).
4. Types of scientific publications. Rebenok i obshchestvo : setevoe izd. URL: http://childandsociety.ru/ojs/index.php/cas/pages/view/typeofpublications (accessed 29.06.2020). (In Russ.).
5. Knizhnyi rynok Rossii. Sostoyanie, tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya: otraslevoi dokl. [Russian book market. the status, trends and development prospects: branch rep.]. Moscow, 2020. 97 p. (In Russ.).
6. About the situation with books in Russia. Knizhnaya industriya. 2020. URL: https://www.bookind.ru/events/9789 (accessed 25.05.2020). (In Russ.).
7. Kochukova E. V., Podkorytova N. I. Development of the academic library documentation base in the modern system of scientific communications. Bibliotekovedenie, 2018, 67(1): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2018-67-1-33-40. (In Russ.).
8. Tsvetkova V. A. D. Scientific book publishing in Russia: crisis or paradigm shift? Bibliotekovedenie, 2018, 67(2): 127–136. https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2018-67-2-127-136. (In Russ.).
9. Shurygina I. L. Bibliographic culture of scientific communication and publication. Bibliografiya, 2016, 2: 52–78. (In Russ.).
10. Larin S. N., Khrustalev Iu. E. Research of modern approaches to financing basic scientific researches abroad and in Russia. Finansy i kredit, 2014, 17: 10–21. (In Russ.).
11. Khrulev A. A. The role of scientometrics in the strategic planning of scientific activity. Nauchnotekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2019, 1: 21–26. (In Russ.).
12. Presidential Decree on 07.05.2012, No. 599 «On measures for implementation of the state policy in the field of education and science». Garant: informatsionnopravovoi portal. URL: http://base.garant.ru/70170946 (accessed 26.05.2020). (In Russ.).
13. Semenov E. V. Production of indicators as a mechanism to suppress production of knowledge, technology and competencies. Upravlenie naukoi: teoriya i praktika, 2020, 2(1): 69–93. (In Russ.).
14. Molini A., Bodenkhauzen D. Bibliometry as a weapon of mass quoting. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2017, 87(1): 70–77. (In Russ.).
15. Lenskiy B. V. Scientific book publishing in the publishing system evolution of Russia (1912-2012). Knizhnaya kul'tura: istoriya i sovremennost'. Moscow, 2015, 2: 39–44. (In Russ.).
16. Digital transformation: threats and opportunities. Universitetskaia kniga, 2019, 2: 70-74. (In Russ.).
17. Lakizo I. G. Siberian scientists' growth of interest in open resources. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN, 2019, 2: 44–49. (In Russ.).
18. 2020s: challenges and opportunities of the new decade. Universitetskaia kniga, 2020, 3: 30-34. (In Russ.).
19. Gorbunov-Posadov M., Polilova T. Scientific monography: ways to edition and reader. Preprinty IPM im. M.V. Keldysha, 2017, 25. URL: https://keldysh.ru/papers/2017/prep2017_25.pdf (accessed 26.05.2020). (In Russ.).
20. Is required a deposit copy? Universitetskaia kniga, 2014; 4: 26–31. (In Russ.).
21. Ridero – a space where everyone can create his own book. Ridero. URL: https://ridero.ru/about.html (accessed: 26.05.2020). (In Russ.).
22. Ridero summarized the results of 2019. Ridero. 2020. URL: https://ridero.ru/blog/?p=3988 (accessed: 26.05.2020). (In Russ.).
23. Golubev A. V. Two sides of Lap Lambert Academic Publishing: a few words on conditions and consequences of easy scientific publication. Istoricheskaya ekspertiza, 2014, 1: 112–114. (In Russ.).
24. Gorbunov-Posadov M. M. Internet-aktivnost' kak obyazannost' uchenogo [Internet activity as a scholar’s duty]. Ekaterinburg, Izd. resheniya, 2017. 64 p. (In Russ.).
25. Gorbunov-Posadov M. M., Polilova T. A. Book publishing and the Internet. Nauchnyi servis v seti Internet: tr. XIX Vseros. nauch. konf. (Novorossijsk, 18–23 sent. 2017 g.). Moscow, 2017: 109–110. (In Russ.).
26. The issue of qualification in the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences of publications in the form of books by the LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: on-line meeting of the Scientific and Publishing Council of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (March 25 – April 10, 2012). Dal'nevostochnoe otdelenie Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. URL: http://www.febras.ru/niso/399-ob-izdaniyakh-v-forme-knig-izdatelstva-lap-lambertacademic-publishing (accessed 26.05.2020). (In Russ.).
27. Schlieter K. Schröpfen on demand. Die Tageszeitung. 18.07.2011. URL: https://taz.de/!5116172 (accessed 26.05.2020).
28. Romanova M., Babkin A. Sovremennye aspekty dietologii: o sovremennykh aspektakh pitaniya zdorovogo i bol'nogo cheloveka [Modern aspects of dietetics: on modern aspects of nutrition of a healthy and sick person]. [S. l.], LAP. Lambert Acad. Publ., 2012. 124 p. (In Russ.).
29. Tsvetkova V. A., Mokhnacheva Ju. V. Academic books and bibliometrics. Kul’tura: teoriya i praktika, 2018, 1. URL: http://theoryofculture.ru/issues/80/1026 (accessed 02.06.2020). (In Russ.).
30. Bubnova N. I. Prodvizhenie idei v obshchestvennopoliticheskikh naukakh: nemnogo solntsa v kholodnoi vode [Promotion of ideas in social sciences: a bit sun in cold water]. Мoscow, Polit. entsikl., 2019. 207 p. (In Russ.).
31. Belaia T. I., Timoveyeva E. A. Design issues of modern electronic books. Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki, 2014, 2: 205–208. (In Russ.).
32. Yakovlev B. S., Proskuriakov N. E., Chrevatyi R. S. Design peculiar properties of electronic books. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2010, 2(2): 195–200. (In Russ.).
33. Tal'chuk K. S. Russian scientific publications: current status and development prospects. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura, 2016, 2: 86–88. (In Russ.).
34. Order no.1953 of September 5, 2011 “On approval the license standards to licensee availability of teaching and academic literature, other library and information sources and teaching aids on the programs of higher professional education implemented according to the license to carry out educational activity”. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 2011, 260. URL: https://rg.ru/2011/11/18/rosobrnadzor-dok.html (accessed 26.05.2020). (In Russ.).
35. Electronic library (repository). Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. URL: http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Index (accessed 26.05.2020). (In Russ.).
36. Novina E. Paper versus numbers: a director of the Russian Book Chamber on the fall of book publishing, a shortage of books and eternal storage. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 2017, 91. URL: https://rg.ru/2017/04/27/elena-noginamnogie-elektronnye-izdaniia-sohraniaiutsia-huzhe-chempechatnye.html (accessed 07.05.2020). (In Russ.).
37. Guskov A. E., Kosyakov D. V., Makeeva O. V. The matrix of tasks, resources and competences for research libraries. Bibliosfera, 2019; 3: 35–46. (In Russ.).
38. Tikhonova L. N. Acquisitions in scientific libraries. Bibliografiya i knigovedenie, 2017, 4: 72–75. (In Russ.).
39. Sukhorukov K. M. Registration of a legal deposit at the Russian book chamber: problems and prospectives. Vzaimovliyanie informatsionno-bibliotechnoi sredy i obshhestvennykh nauk. Moscow, 2019: 122–136. (In Russ.).
40. Antopolsky A. B. Trends in scientific communication development. Elektronnoe informatsionnoe prostranstvo dlya nauki, obrazovaniya, kul'tury: materialy VII Vseros. (s mezhdunar. uchastiem) nauch.-prakt. konf. Oryol, 2020: 15–26. (In Russ.).
41. Podkorytova N. I., Bosina L. V. Scientific publications modern flow of documentation as an object of large academic libraries library stock formation. Vestnik kul'tury i iskusstv, 2018, 2: 15–21. (In Russ.).
42. Podkorytova N. I. The system of indicators as a tool to improve the quality of selection of documents in the fund of the academic library. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN, 2018, 13(1): 227–236. (In Russ.).
43. Podkorytova N. I., Galkina T. A., Strelina L. M., Tretyakov D. A. Completeness of the scientific documentary flow within legal deposit. Bibliografiya i knigovedenie, 2015; 4: 14–20. (In Russ.).
44. Podkorytova N. I., Bosina L. V., Tretyakov D. A., Scientific monograph in a research library – searching for acquisition sources. Vestnik kul'tury i iskusstv, 2019, 1: 25–35. (In Russ.).
45. Linde P., Wessels B. A., Sveinsdottir T., Noorman M. How can libraries and other academic institutions engage in making data open? Mezhdunarodnyi forum po informatsii, 2015, 40(1): 22–27. (In Russ.).
46. Pogačnik A. Science should be open, right? Mezhdunarodnyi forum po informatsii, 2019, 44(4): 3–17. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kuular M.Ch. Scientific monograph – a difficult way to the reader. Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS. 2020;(3):81-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2020-3-81-89
Views:
815
Email this article 