Research priorities as the problem of bibliometric studies

Revealing research fronts and detecting research priorities are one of the most significant problems in the science of science and scientific policy due to the crucial importance when planning research. Bibliometric approaches are the main tool when detecting research trends and fronts providing the basis for further expertise of research priority. To date, different approaches have been developed for research trends and fronts detection including analysis of scholarly output, citation analysis, and content analysis. The most spread is citation analysis and its variants, i.e., direct citation analysis, co-citation analysis, and bibliographic coupling. The paper discusses the main features of each method; describes current issues of detecting research fronts and setting of research priorities. The authors conclude that bibliometric approaches for detecting research fronts and research priorities are objective, especially when combining different forms of bibliometric analyses. Bibliometrics seems to be the most promising approach due to its flexibility and capability to be rapidly adapted to a dynamic scientific environment and new publication models. 

1. Mazov N. A., Gureyev V. N., Epov M. I. The results of the scientometric analysis of the world stream of well logging publications. Karotazhnik, 2017, 12: 65–86. (In Russ.).

2. Mazov N. A., Gureyev V. N. Areas of concern when setting research priority. Upravlenie naukoi: teoriya i praktika, 2020, 2(3): 37–51. DOI: 10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.2. (In Russ.).

3. Ilyichev A., Karpenko L., Gureyev V., Mazov N. Development of phage display technology: a bibliometric assessment. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 2016, 16(1): 34–42. DOI: 10.3844/ojbsci.2016.34.42.

4. Liu X., Jiang T., Ma F. Collective dynamics in knowledge networks: Emerging trends analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(2): 425–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.003.

5. Upham S. P., Small H. Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(1): 15–38. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0051-9.

6. De Solla Price D. J. Networks of scientific papers. Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510–515. DОI: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510.

7. Hsiao C.-H., Tang K.-Y., Liu J. S. Citation-based analysis of literature: a case study of technology acceptance research. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(2): 1091–1110. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1749-5.

8. Marrone M. Application of entity linking to identify research fronts and trends. Scientometrics, 2020, 122(1): 357–379. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03274-x.

9. Fajardo-Ortiz D., Lopez-Cervantes M., Duran L., Dumontier M., Lara M., Ochoa H., Castano V. M. The emergence and evolution of the research fronts in HIV/ AIDS research. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(5): e0178293. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178293.

10. Price D. J. The exponential curve of science. Discovery, 1956, 17: 240–243.

11. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265–269.

12. Marshakova I. V. A system of document links based on references. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 2: Informatsionnye protsessy i sistemy, 1973, 6: 3–8. (In Russ.).

13. Kessler M. M. An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1963, 9(1): 49–51. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.1963.1057800.

14. Kessler M. M. Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexing. American Documentation, 1965, 16(3): 223–233. DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090160309.

15. Fujimagari H., Fujita K. Detecting research fronts using neural network model for weighted citation network analysis. Journal of Information Processing, 2015, 23(6): 753–758. DOI: 10.2197/ipsjjip.23.753.

16. Olmeda-Gómez C., Ovalle-Perandones M.-A., Perianes-Rodríguez A. Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985– 2014. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(1): 195–217. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2486-8.

17. Li M., Chu Y. Explore the research front of a specific research theme based on a novel technique of enhanced co-word analysis. Journal of Information Science, 2017, 43(6): 725–741. DOI: 10.1177/0165551516661914.

18. Fujita K., Kajikawa Y., Mori J., Sakata I. Detecting research fronts using different types of weighted citation networks. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2014, 32: 129–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.07.002.

19. Shibata N., Kajikawa Y., Takeda Y., Matsushima K. Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(3): 571–580. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20994.

20. Huang M. H., Chang C. P. A comparative study on detecting research fronts in the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) field using bibliographic coupling and co-citation. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(3): 2041–2057. DOI: 10.1007/ s11192-014-1494-1.

21. Boyack K. W., Klavans R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(12): 2389–2404. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21419.