The Model of the Advisory Bibliographic Resource for Communication between Science and Society

The advisory bibliographic resource (ABR) is one of reliable ways of transiting experience, knowledge and skills from one generation to another. The question about bibliographic resources, satisfying needs in educational and self-educational reading, though being in elaboration for a long time, has not been solved finally yet. It is supposed, that any purposeful activity, realized by means of books and going out the frames of educational establishments, makes up the essence of self-educational activity, with ABR being the foothold for it. ABR, aimed at informal education of readers should be of special importance.

The purpose of the article is to present the results of the study on the development and evaluation of the effectiveness of ABR, created according to the modern model. Science and society communication models that influenced the creation of modern ABR are briefly characterized, and a double-sided model of their creation is proposed. The comparative analysis of the current (one-sided) and new model of ABR creation has been conducted. The results of the pedagogical experiment on evaluating the effectiveness of ABR, created according to the double-sided model and affecting the established areas of communication between science and society (education, understanding, participation) are presented. During the experiment, conducted using the questionnaire method, it has been stated that handling of ABR, created for to disseminate scientific knowledge according to the double-sided model, contributes to an increase in the level of readers’ awareness.

1. Sokolov AV and Berestova TF (2014) Paradigms of bibliography: book, document, resource: essays on the past and future of bibliographic science. Chelyabinsk: Chelyab. gos. akad. kul'tury i iskusstv. (In Russ.).

2. Bucchi M (2008) Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: theories of public communication of science. Handbook of public communication of science and technology. London, New York, pp. 57–76.

3. Weinberger N, Woll S, Kyba CCM and Schulte-Römer N (2021) The value of citizen participation in technology assessment, responsible research and innovation, and sustainable development. Sustainability 13 (21): 11613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111613.

4. Lewenstein BV (2007) Why should we care about science books? Journal of Science Communication (JCOM) 6 (1): C03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.06010303.

5. Morgenshtern IG (2001) Advisory or popular? Voprosy bibliografovedeniya. Moscow, iss. 11, pp. 33–39. (In Russ.).

6. Tugov YuM (1979) Theoretical foundations of the integrity of the advisory bibliographic manual. Rekomendatel'noe bibliograficheskoe posobie: problemy ego tselostnosti. Moscow, pp. 5–21. (In Russ.).

7. Fomina EN (1979) Towards the creation of an idealized model of a manual in recommendatory bibliography. Rekomendatel'noe bibliograficheskoe posobie: problemy ego tselostnosti. Moscow, pp. 22–36. (In Russ.).

8. Kulikova AP (1979) Comprehensive manual as a means of organizing versatile reading for young people to help their social orientation. Rekomendatel'noe bibliograficheskoe posobie: problemy ego tselostnosti. Moscow, pp. 37–53. (In Russ.).

9. Grishanina NA (comp.) [et al.] (1987) Advisory and bibliographic manual: compilation and use: methodological recommendations. Moscow: GBL. (In Russ.).

10. Kulikova AP (1991) New approaches in bibliographic promotion of scientific and technical knowledge. Novye podkhody k razvitiyu sistemy rekomendatel'no-bibliograficheskikh posobii: metod. rekomendatsii. Moscow, pp. 38–51. (In Russ.).

11. Yuklyaevskaya AV (2023) Selected bibliographic resources for the promotion of scientific knowledge on the websites of libraries in Russia. Bibliosfera 1: 65–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2023-1-65-72. (In Russ.).

12. Morgenshtern IG (2007) The information and book world. Bibliography: (selected). Saint Petersburg: Professiya. (In Russ.).

13. Bespalova EK (1977) The system of advisory bibliography manuals and ways to improve its effectiveness in modern conditions: lecture. Moscow: MGIK. (In Russ.).

14. Teplitskaya IB (1973) The influence of advisory bibliography on the formation and development of young people's interests. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya rekomendatel'noi bibliografii. Moscow, pp. 67–79. (In Russ.).

15. Mayants LL (1980) Results of studying the effectiveness of using SHPL recommendation manuals in public libraries of the RSFSR (1976–1979). Voprosy teorii, metodiki i effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya rekomendatel'noi istoricheskoi bibliografii. Moscow, pp. 99–120. (In Russ.).

16. Vokhrysheva MG (1973) The breadth of the readership coverage as an indicator of the effectiveness of various means of literature promotion. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya rekomendatel'noi bibliografii. Moscow, pp. 108–117. (In Russ.).

17. Trubnikov SA (1973) Problems of recommendatory bibliography in the light of the Marxist-Leninist philosophical doctrine of value. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya rekomendatel'noi bibliografii. Moscow, pp. 19–34. (In Russ.).

18. Gilyazova IB and Mel'nikova OYu (2012) Diagnostic tools for assessing the components of the scientific worldview of students within the framework of education for the sustainable development of civilization. Vestnik Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni S. A. Esenina 4: 15–23. (In Russ.).