Preparing Library Professionals to Popularize Open Science in the System of Additional Professional Education
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-1-80-92
Abstract
Libraries have traditionally been involved in educating and supporting scientific process. However, the spread of the open science concept has led to changes in the way libraries support science. Promoting open science among various members of the society is an integral part of this change. Based on pre-viously identified competences necessary for such participation, as well as the structural-functional model of forming the librarian-bibliographer popularizer of open science competences, the course of professional development was organized in SPSTL SB RAS.
The purpose of the article is to present the results of training the librarians at the professional development course “Librarian- Bibliographer - Instructor of Open Science”.
Two tasks were associated with the achievement of the goal: 1) to clarify the level of preparedness of library professionals to popularize open science, and 2) to determine the usefulness of the course by comparing the level of preparedness of library professionals and professionals who graduated from the advanced training program. Based on the survey of the 4th year Bachelor of Library and Information Science graduates of 11 universities of Russia, and a survey of professionals working in libraries completed in December 2024, it was determined that library professionals have difficulties in organizing activities within the framework of citizen science and in complying with current legal regulations in the area of copyright and related rights. The advanced training course “Librarian-Bibliographer – Open Science Instructor”, developed to close the gaps in the erudition of library specialists, according to the results of the analysis of final testing of students and their comparison with the obtained data, showed the increase in the level of competences necessary for a librarian- bibliographer to popularize open science.
Keywords
open science,
competencies of librarians,
competencies of bibliographers,
distance learning,
professional development
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared according to the research plan of GPSTB CO RAS, project "Development of a model for the functioning of a scientific library in the information ecosystem of open science", No. 122041100150-3
About the Author
A. E. Rykhtorova
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Anna Evgenievna Rykhtorova, Junior researcher
Open Science Research Department
630102; 15 Voskhod St.; Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest that require disclosure in this article
References
1. Redkina NS (2022) Library in the information infrastructure of open science. Novosibirsk: GPNTB SO RAN. (In Russ).
2. Ryabova II (2023) News informing on open science as a strategic direction for the development of a scientific library. Bibliotekovedenie 72 (5): 425–434. (In Russ). doi: 10.25281/0869-608X-2023-72-5-425-434
3. Yudina IG and Vakhrameeva ZV (2024) Science, society and library (results of the survey of scientists from research institutes of the SB RAS). Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologii 15 (1): 160–179. (In Russ). doi: 10.24412/2079-0910-2024-1-160-179
4. Pinto F de MAG (2024) Publicação de dados de pesquisa no contexto da comunicação científica: cenário terminológico- conceitual. Ciência da Informação 53 (esp.): 48–64. doi: 10.18225/CI.INF.V53I.6668
5. Pleshakova MA and Kalyuzhnaya TA (2024) Intercultural communication (science–society) in the language worldview of library readers. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie 55: 183–199. (In Russ). doi: 10.17223/22220836/55/15
6. Trishchenko ND and Mikhailovskaya VA (2024) Opportunities for the use of short videos in science communication: the case of social sciences. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism 29 (3): 564–576.
7. Shevchenko LB (2023) Open science: scientists are in favor, what about librarians? Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 2: 113–131. (In Russ). doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-113-131
8. Rykhtorova AE (2024) Readiness of the graduates’ of Library and Information Activities Departments for open science facilitation. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 11: 141–159. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2024-11-141-159
9. Rykhtorova AE (2024) Formation of competences of a librarian-bibliographer – popularizer of open science in additional vocational training. Bibliotekovedenie 73 (3): 273–287. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25281/0869-608X-2024-73-3-273-287
10. Saunders MV and Jamieson LM (2020) Contextual framework for developing research competence: piloting a validated classroom model. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 20 (3): 1–19. doi: 10.14434/josotl.v20i3.24487
11. Shukshina TI, Demyashkina YuA, Zamkin PV, Averyanova II and Zeynalov GGO (2022) Potencial da tecnologia de caso na formação da competência de pesquisa dos alunos em aprendizagem orientada à prática. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional 26 (esp. 2): e022058. doi: 10.22633/rpge.v26iesp.2.16555
Supplementary files
|
|
1. Рис. 1. Сравнение ответов бакалавров – выпускников БИД и сотрудников библиотек, часть 1. А) представление о планировании финансирования проекта, включающего волонтерскую деятельность (компетенция 1); Б) представление о включении проектов гражданской науки и научного волонтерства в деятельность различных типов и видов библиотек (компетенция 2); В) является ли библиотека научным коммуникатором (компетенция 2); Г) понимание отличий в организации массовых мероприятий и мероприятий при работе с проектами научного волонтерства и гражданской науки (компетенция 3); Д) ориентируются в возможных путях дополнения технологий коммуникации науки и общества библиотечными видами деятельности (компетенция 3) | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(89KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
2. Рис. 2. Навыки и умения, развитию которых отдают предпочтение выпускники БИД и сотрудники библиотека | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(203KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
3. Рис. 3. Сравнение ответов бакалавров – выпускников БИД и сотрудников библиотек, часть 2. А) указание лицензии, позволяющей перевести произведение в общественное достояние (компетенция 1); Б) указание некоммерческого использования и запрета на создание производных произведений (компетенция 1); В) указание на права, предоставляемые лицензиями FOSS (компетенция 1); Г) указание на способ доведения до всеобщего сведения РИД (компетенция 1); Д) корректное указание авторства произведения (компетенция 1) | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(92KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
4. Рис. 4. Сравнение ответов выпускников БИД, сотрудников библиотек и обучающихся, окончивших КПК (в %), часть 1. А) представление о планировании финансирования проекта, включающего волонтерскую деятельность; Б) понимание руководящей роли исследователей в рамках проекта гражданской науки; В) определение инициатора проекта гражданской науки | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(117KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
5. Рис. 5. Сравнение ответов выпускников БИД, сотрудников библиотек и обучающихся, окончивших КПК (в %), часть 2. А) указание лицензии, позволяющей перевести произведение в общественное достояние; Б) указание некоммерческого использования и запрета на создание производных произведений; В) указание на способ доведения до всеобщего сведения РИД; Г) корректное указание авторства произведения | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(150KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Rykhtorova A.E. Preparing Library Professionals to Popularize Open Science in the System of Additional Professional Education. Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS. 2025;(1):80-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-1-80-92
Views:
137
Email this article 