LIBRARY INFORMATION SERVICES FOR THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2019-2-54-57
Abstract
The authors study the experience of foreign libraries (especially of USA and Canada) in rendering information services to the professional medical community. Publications on this item from 1980-es up to present times are the material for the analysis. As an example of successful interaction between foreign libraries and physicians, the following models are listed as “clinical librarianship”, ”embedded librarianship”, research information management.
About the Authors
A. V. Bagirova
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPSTL SB RAS)
Russian Federation
Bagirova Alexandra Valeryevna - Leading Bibliographer of the Reference- Bibliographic Department
Russian Federation
Bagirova Alexandra Valeryevna - Leading Bibliographer of the Reference- Bibliographic Department
P. A. Chesnyalis
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPSTL SB RAS)
Russian Federation
Chesnyalis Polina Anatolyevna - Candidate of Philological Sciences, Researcher of the Laboratory of Information- Systematic Analysis
Russian Federation
Chesnyalis Polina Anatolyevna - Candidate of Philological Sciences, Researcher of the Laboratory of Information- Systematic Analysis
References
1. Васина Е. Ю. Информационно- библиографическая работа: выбираем приоритеты // Б-ки вузов Урала. 2003. № 4. С. 37–43.
2. Свирюкова В. Г. Справочно- библиографическое обслуживание – поиск оптимальной модели // Труды ГПНТБ СО РАН. Новосибирск, 2017. Вып. 12: Библиотека традиционная и электронная: смыслы и ценности : материалы межрегион. науч.-практ. конф. (Новосибирск, 4–6 окт. 2016 г.), т. 2. Новосибирск, 2017. С. 167–174.
3. Назаренко М. А. Особенности европейской интеграции в сфере профессионального образования // Мир науки, культуры, образования. 2013. № 5. С. 50–53.
4. Keys T. E. Medical librarianship: looking toward 1970 // Bull. of Med. Libr. Assoc. 1939. V. 27, N3. P. 208–212.
5. Cimpl K. Clinical medical librarianship: a review of the literature // Bull. of Med. Libr. Assoc. 1985. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 21–28.
6. Yadagiri S., Thalluri S., Vidya P. Information technology on surge: information literacy on demand // DESIDOC. J. of Libr. Inform. Technology. 2012. Vol. 32, N1. P. 64–69.
7. Morris M., Boruff J. T., Gore G. C. Scoping reviews: establishing the role of the librarian // J. of Med. Libr. Assoc. 2016. Vol. 104, N4. P. 346–353.
8. Arcari R. D. Clinical librarian program-cost recovery effort // Clin. Libr. Q. 1982. V. 1, N2. P. 7–10.
9. Clinical medical librarianship: the Vanderbilt experience / Giuse N. B. S. R. Kafantaris, M. D. Miller [et al.] // Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 1998. V. 86, N3. P. 412–416.
10. Каменская М. А. Эволюция информационно- библиотечного обслуживания: вопросы терминологии // Науч.-техн. информ. Сер. 1: Орг. и методика информ. работы. 2016. № 8. С. 24–33.
11. Livingston J. The benefits of library liaison programs for small libraries: an overview // Med. Ref. Services Quarterly. 2003. Vol. 22, N1. P. 21–30.
12. Shumaker D. The embedded Librarian: Innovative strategies for taking knowledge. Medford : N. J.: Inform. Today, Inc. 2012. 240 p.
13. Greyson D, Surette S., Dennett L. You’re just one of the group when you’re embedded: report from a mixed- method investigation of the research- embedded health librarian // J. of Med. Libr. Assoc. 2013. Vol. 101, N4. P. 287–297.
14. Federer L. The librarian as research informationist: a case study // J. of Med. Libr. Assoc. 2013. Vol. 101, N4. P. 298–302.
Review
For citations:
Bagirova A.V., Chesnyalis P.A. LIBRARY INFORMATION SERVICES FOR THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE. Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS. 2019;(2):54-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2019-2-54-57
Views:
527
Email this article 